more than eight,000 present and latest Uber and Lyft drivers in Massachusetts were banned from using in the state below new, stricter background take a look at laws.
In November, the ride-sharing companies agreed to let the state run its personal historical past checks as part of a deal that would let Lyft and Uber drivers provider Logan Airport.
more than 70,000 drivers applied for the checks. the results of the state’s first screening have been announced on Wednesday, and greater than 10% of candidates did not pass.
the most typical cause of rejecting drivers was a previous suspended license. greater than 1,500 drivers have been rejected for a violent crime charge. other causes for denial incorporated quite a lot of driving offenses, felony convictions, and intercourse, abuse and exploitation. The state also identified 51 sex offenders.
now not all of the rejections were for felony causes. Many drivers had now not held a license lengthy enough to qualify beneath the brand new ideas. Others had an inactive license.
In a statement, governor Charlie Baker stated Massachusetts has “set a national standard for driver safety.”
Uber and Lyft generally rely on their very own historical past exams, in search of disqualifying offenses prior to now seven years. Massachusetts checks are completely different in just a few key ways, in step with Massachusetts criminal defense attorney Johanna Griffiths.
They take a look at a drivers’ complete lifetime instead of simply the past seven years. additionally they embrace individuals who had a “continuance with out a discovering” on their report. also called a CWOF, it’s a kind of plea deal that lets defendants steer clear of a responsible conviction.
related: Pittsburgh’s rocky relationship with Uber takes another turn
considered one of Griffith’s purchasers is a pediatric nurse at a Boston health facility who drives for trip-hailing firms on the aspect. He didn’t move the state history take a look at as a result of a 25-yr-old CWOF for assault and battery he bought after a battle with a member of the family.
Lyft says the seven-yr cap is why it did not in finding the same drivers in its personal tests.
“underneath Massachusetts regulation, Lyft’s business historical past check provider, like several shopper reporting businesses, is legally averted from looking back additional than seven years into driver candidates’ histories. The state does not face the identical problem, which probably explains why a small proportion of our drivers failed the state’s history test whereas passing ours,” mentioned Lyft in a statement.
even supposing it previously agreed to the heritage tests, Uber just isn’t pleased with the consequences.
“the new screening comprises an unfair and unjust indefinite lookback length that has caused heaps of people in Massachusetts to lose get entry to to economic alternatives,” said Uber in a statement. “we have now an opportunity to repair the present gadget in the rules process so that individuals who need to work usually are not denied the opportunity.”
Massachusetts passed legislation final summer that incorporated plenty of new rules for corporations like Uber, equivalent to inspection and insurance necessities. experience-hailing companies have unless 2018 to conform to the law, so there may still time to vary the foundations. Public hearings are scheduled for may just.
CNNMoney (San Francisco) First printed April 5, 2017: 7:fifty eight PM ET
latest financial news – CNNMoney.com