Moneyism: Is Daniel Craig smart to turn down the $a hundred million James Bond function?

every now and then cash — even an immense pile of it — just isn’t enough to make a job price it.

Actor Daniel Craig, who has performed James Bond in four movies, reportedly became down a hefty paycheck (which information reports peg at nearly $ one hundred million) to play the British Secret service agent in two more films, The Telegraph said Thursday.

This comes after he advised day trip journal final yr that “I’d moderately destroy this glass and scale down my wrists” than do any other Bond film.

whereas most of us couldn’t think about turning down $ a hundred million (let by myself $ 1 million) to megastar in probably the most enduring film franchises in Hollywood historical past, Craig isn’t alone in shunning a tremendous paycheck. Jerry Seinfeld reportedly became down roughly $ one hundred million to make another season of Seinfeld and Keanu Reeves reportedly backed out of an $ eleven million deal to celebrity in pace 2.

“they have got already made vast amounts of cash,” says ny-based totally profession train Roy Cohen, creator of The Wall boulevard professional’s Survival information. “the value may just look like loads to the rest of us, but it won’t imply that a lot to them.”

Even for some of us whose paychecks don’t come on the subject of a seven-figures, money isn’t the whole lot — and even a very powerful thing — relating to our careers.

In a contemporary survey with the aid of the Society of Human useful resource administration, staff mentioned that alternatives to make use of their skills and abilities have been a very powerful factor for their career pride; pay ranked 0.33. and some 54% of individuals mentioned their colleagues as a prime cause they stayed at their jobs, followed by means of excellent work/existence stability; pay ranked fourth, according to a up to date survey of more than 3,000 workers through Careerbuilder, a job search site.

What’s more, workers who had cease their jobs throughout the ultimate yr stated that the No. 1 reason they did so used to be an absence of occupation advancement alternatives (26% said this used to be the explanation, when compared with fewer than one in 4 who pay), in step with the 2015 staffing firm Randstad’s organization Branding Survey, which surveyed greater than 10,000 workers.

after all, shunning a lift or a larger paycheck isn’t an possibility for many of us, says Cohen. when you’re in that boat, Cohen recommends evaluating what it is that you just don’t like about your career possibility and seeing if that you could trade that. perhaps you just like the work however don’t just like the lengthy hours, he says; in that case, might you chop your hours for rather less pay or change to a box with less irritating hours, as an instance?

still, workers is also smart to place different qualities over pay when evaluating occupation alternatives. certainly, once you’re making about $ 75,000 per yr, cash doesn’t purchase extra happiness, in line with a study launched in 2010 by Princeton university’s Woodrow Wilson school.

Let’s block advertisements! (Why?)

MarketWatch.com – high tales